Evaluation

IWMW 1998 Workshop Evaluation

Feedback on the Event Content

Positive Comments

  • A good range of presentations
  • A very informative 3 days
  • More useful than I thought it would be! Will take lots of ideas back with me.
  • A very enjoyable 3 days – lots of information and views – probably far too many to really assimilate & address.
  • Excellent organisation; speakers with knowledge & experience.
  • Brilliant! Useful, informative, friendly. Superlatives are appropriate. I want to come to the next one. We should have at least one a year.
  • Good to see so many people here. Valuable chance to meet others.
  • Well-organised, good time-keeping, mainly interesting sessions
  • Renewed my enthusiasm for the Web
  • Critical mass of people attending
  • Fulfilled its aims well. Worth coming
  • Well-organised. Presentations were really interesting and useful. I really appreciated the parallel sessions.
  • Excellent. Perhaps more hands-on and group discussions needed.
  • Very useful and enlightening.
  • Well worth attending. It was useful to have the opportunity to discuss problems I thought were unique to my institution and to hear what is going o within the community. I also learnt more about web developments which I just do not have the time to find out about while at work.
  • Felt talks were of a higher quality than at Kings. Good balance of talks.
  • Both useful and enjoyable
  • Excellent! It’s nice to have affirmed that I’m not the only person with my set of (web) problems.
  • Really useful – it gave me a great deal of enthusiasm & confidence in my job! (It’s easy to get demoralised when trying to face all these web issues in relative isolation).
  • Much better than the King’s event last year. Worth the very long journey.
  • Excellent opportunity for networking
  • Useful to meet so many people with the same problems, and see what we should be doing.
  • Very useful. Lots to think over and do on return

Negative Comments

Participants were asked to list up to 3 aspects which were disappointing or could be improved.

  • Too much passive listening all at once, felt a bit overwhelmed
  • The fact that it was possible to attend only 1 parallel session – make them shorter and “tighter”
  • No opportunity to try web tools “hands-on”
  • Commercial displays / involvement poor
  • Not enough time for questions
  • I wanted to attend all 5 workshops!
  • If it goes on screen it should be available on a handout.
  • Would it be feasible to have a form input prior to the next workshop, allowing people to input a very brief lists of experience, activities and main concerns. This could be put up on a site and allow people to organise informal groups at the workshop
  • Little on teaching on the web

Workshop Organisation Comments

Positive Comments

  • Excellent venue and speakers & food (for a change).

Negative Comments

  • Participants were asked to list up to 3 aspects which were disappointing or could be improved.
  • Temperature (again)
  • Accommodation
  • Lunches were a bit naff
  • Communication before workshop – joining instructions
  • Too cold
  • Would have been better if we hadn’t been split over Newcastle., – a shared hotel would have been good
  • Evening meals could induce scurvy over long term.
  • Suggest alternative to tea and coffee at breaks (water / juice)
  • Food very poor
  • PCs … were slow & cost us time during parallel sessions
  • Catering – awful dinners